Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1304 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3250 - 117 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $52.0 vs $56.34
- Up to 14% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-3250 - $0.44 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3206 minutes ago
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |