Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3240 - 199 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $41.0 vs $52.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-7400T - $0.21 vs $0.26 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14303 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |