Buy on Amazon
$41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $41.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 55% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-6700T - $0.41 vs $0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3240 - 110 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5479 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5480 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
