Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2498 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $41.0 vs $81.39
- Up to 47% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.16 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3240 - 268 vs 255 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15785 minutes ago
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |