Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $41.0 vs $85.0
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3240 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74905 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74906 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
46.39865996649916%
Multi-Core
1137
48.67294520547945%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |