Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $41.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10400F - $0.32 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3240 - 135 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5356 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
43%
Price, $
$99.95
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |