Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 50 days older than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than FX-8300 - $41.0 vs $112.02
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - $0.27 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2148 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |