Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 254 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $39.99 vs $52.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-7400T - $0.17 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14608 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14607 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |