Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1820 - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $46.41 vs $75.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7400T - $0.28 vs $0.44 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
166
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |