Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 639 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $46.41 vs $100.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-6100 - $0.08 vs $0.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1820 - 683 vs 605 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
605
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |