Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 581 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $46.41 vs $64.78
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 157 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75072 minutes ago
Buy for $64.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
73.17436661698957%
Multi-Core
825
35.88516746411483%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |