Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 404 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8320 - $46.41 vs $74.82
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75095 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |