Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 932 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 43% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $46.41 vs $81.79
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.24 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1820 - 202 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
195
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
60%
Price, $
$81.79
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |