Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $46.41 vs $85.13
- Up to 29% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-10105F - $0.77 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 30% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1820 - 78 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
60
76%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1471 minutes ago
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |