Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 912 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $46.41 vs $120.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-6900K - $0.3 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1528 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1528 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |