Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1493 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 52% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3770K - 47 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $120.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3770K - $2.55 vs $5.65 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4989 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4988 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |