Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $46.41 vs $115.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11400F - $0.42 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 128 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13659 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
46%
Price, $
$115.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |