Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $46.41 vs $99.95
- Up to 48% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400F - $0.32 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1820 - 163 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
144
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1213 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
52%
Price, $
$99.95
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |