Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 808 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Athlon 200GE - 185 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 10% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $69.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 2% better value when playing Rust than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.41 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
97%
Price, $
$78.02
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
172
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |