Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 652 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Celeron G4900 - 751 vs 697 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $53.55 vs $1425.0
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $1,425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.20338983050847%
Multi-Core
1051
19.17883211678832%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |