Buy on Amazon
$53.55
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $53.55 vs $998.95
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 188 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 28 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75413 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9940X X-Series Tray
Buy for $998.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
42.220699108978756%
Multi-Core
1051
9.791317309483883%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 28 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
