Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $68.02 vs $582.8
- Up to 81% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.68 vs $3.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 60% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 160 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13860 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.64/FPS
18%
Price, $
$582.8
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $582.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13860 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |