Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 833 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $68.02 vs $897.22
- Up to 91% better value when playing Saints Row than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.46 vs $5.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Saints Row than Celeron G4900 - 166 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
149
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.4/FPS
8%
Price, $
$897.22
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |