Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 601 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $53.55 vs $479.95
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 145% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Celeron G4900 - 125 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for $479.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.95260947810438%
Multi-Core
1051
7.892167905684463%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |