Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 281 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $68.02 vs $495.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-7820X - $0.26 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 42% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 365 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |