Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1372 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $68.02 vs $432.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-12900F - $0.42 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 54% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 248 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
24%
Price, $
$432.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |