Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 826 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $68.02 vs $394.45
- Up to 81% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.35 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 11% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G4900 - 214 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
192
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
19%
Price, $
$394.45
17%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $394.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
