Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1757 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-9590 - 93 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than FX-9590 - $68.02 vs $298.02
- Up to 77% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-9590 - $0.73 vs $3.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13155 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |