Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $68.02 vs $268.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - $0.61 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 21% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 136 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3849 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
30%
Price, $
$268.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |