Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Core i9-10900F - 153 vs 146 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $225.0 vs $268.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i5-13600K - $1.54 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
87%
Price, $
$268.99
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $268.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
146
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |