Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $68.02 vs $294.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-14600KF - $0.41 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
167
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3995 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
26%
Price, $
$294.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |