Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $68.02 vs $230.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7700K - $0.73 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - 110 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |