Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $68.02 vs $265.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Control than Core i9-11900K - $0.34 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Celeron G4900 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4078 minutes ago
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |