Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $68.02 vs $317.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700KF - $0.4 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 220 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3998 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
27%
Price, $
$317.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3999 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |