Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $68.02 vs $235.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700K - $0.44 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
33%
Price, $
$235.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |