Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 92 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $68.02 vs $200.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-8700 - $0.44 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 177 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4676 minutes ago
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |