Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 180 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $68.02 vs $186.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-8700K - $0.28 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - 272 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |