Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $68.02 vs $369.57
- Up to 76% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-14700F - $0.57 vs $2.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 28% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G4900 - 154 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 28 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |