Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $432.99 vs $530.97
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - $2.04 vs $2.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900F - 225 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
94%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10893 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
86%
Price, $
$530.97
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10893 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |