Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2106 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $68.02 vs $529.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.45 vs $3.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G4900 - 168 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
151
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
14%
Price, $
$529.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |