Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Remnant II than Core i3-530 - 80 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 34% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $45.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 32% better value when playing Remnant II than Celeron G4900 - $0.58 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4096 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |