Buy on Amazon
$68.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1610 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 46% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $37.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 44% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Celeron G4900 - $0.31 vs $0.55 per FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
