Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - $37.0 vs $60.0
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 705 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Core i5 i5-4670 3.40 GHz Processor - Socket H3 LGA-1150
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-4670
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
36.3481228668942%
Multi-Core
739
22.893432465923173%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
