Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $37.0 vs $190.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-7600K - $0.16 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1610 - 378 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11955 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-7600K LGA 1151 Desktop Processors (BX80677I57600K)
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11956 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
