Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $37.0 vs $103.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6800K - $0.32 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 128 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14500 minutes ago
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14502 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |