Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 185 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - $37.0 vs $59.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i5-3470 - $0.24 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 55 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 1% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1610 - 153 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11834 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core Processor 3.2 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53470
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
