Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $37.0 vs $85.0
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610 - 231 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74844 minutes ago
Intel 3.70 GHz Core i3-6100 3M Cache Processor (BX80662I36100)
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
35.678391959798994%
Multi-Core
739
31.63527397260274%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
