Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 62% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - $37.0 vs $98.29
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium Gold G6405 - $0.22 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
39%
Price, $
$98.29
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |