Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 38% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $37.0 vs $59.99
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 90% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - 175 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - $0.34 vs $0.4 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10912 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |