Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 694 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $37.0 vs $59.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 116 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
85.88709677419355%
Multi-Core
739
54.65976331360947%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |